Compliance lives in the evidence. Vera keeps it ready.
Vera gathers policies, approvals, control evidence and source links across your tools, drafts audit-ready answers and flags what is missing. You make the judgment; she keeps the trail complete.
The Northstar vendor review is ready. One control still needs an owner.
- Northstar onboarding · review draft
- DPA signed on 8 April; the SCC annex is attached
- SOC 2 report expires on 30 September
- Subprocessor list includes one new EU analytics provider
- Open: the retention exception has no approval owner
Sources- Drive
- Asana
- Vendor thread
- Policy hub
Show me the missing approval and draft the question to Procurement. Do not send it.
- Open evidence
- Show gap
- Open draft
Trusted by
A day with Vera
Gather. Review. Record.
Compliance work depends on evidence that sits across policies, contracts, tickets and conversations. Vera assembles the trail before the review, retrieves the source while you assess it and records the approved outcome afterwards.
- 1Gather
Evidence with context
Policies, tickets, approvals, contracts and control evidence are collected with their owners, dates and original sources. All ready for the review. No chasing evidence needed. No manual lists needed.
You skip:Chasing evidence across five systems
- 2Review
You make the call
Vera finds the relevant clause, exception or previous decision and shows where it came from. You interpret the requirement and decide what the risk means. Always ask, what's next?
You skip:Finding the right policy
- 3Record
The audit trail keeps up
The decision, rationale, owner, due date and supporting evidence are drafted from the work itself and wait for your approval before anything changes. Agreements are recorded based on the conversation.
You skip:Rebuilding the trail before an audit
What actually changes
The same controls,without the evidence chase.
| Task | On your own | With Vera |
|---|---|---|
| Responding to an audit evidence request. | Message control owners, search folders and maintain a manual list of gaps. | A pack with evidence, owners, dates and source links; missing items clearly marked for follow-up. |
| Reviewing a policy against the live process. | Read several versions and compare them with tickets and operating notes. | The current version, related actions and discrepancies assembled in one reviewable view. |
| Reviewing a vendor. | Check the agreement, DPA, questionnaire and certificates separately. | Materials organised against your checklist; gaps flagged without an automated approval. |
| Assessing a regulatory change. | Manually find the owners, systems and procedures the change may affect. | A draft impact map linked to policies, processes and owners, ready for expert judgment. |
| Testing a control. | Select a sample and request confirmations in a chain of messages. | The sample, evidence and exceptions collected with sources for your assessment. |
| Preparing a compliance update for management. | Combine status from spreadsheets, tickets and meeting notes. | A draft with open risks, overdue actions and evidence links, waiting for your review. |
- Task
- Responding to an audit evidence request.
- On your own
- Message control owners, search folders and maintain a manual list of gaps.
- With Vera
- A pack with evidence, owners, dates and source links; missing items clearly marked for follow-up.
- Task
- Reviewing a policy against the live process.
- On your own
- Read several versions and compare them with tickets and operating notes.
- With Vera
- The current version, related actions and discrepancies assembled in one reviewable view.
- Task
- Reviewing a vendor.
- On your own
- Check the agreement, DPA, questionnaire and certificates separately.
- With Vera
- Materials organised against your checklist; gaps flagged without an automated approval.
Show More
- Task
- Assessing a regulatory change.
- On your own
- Manually find the owners, systems and procedures the change may affect.
- With Vera
- A draft impact map linked to policies, processes and owners, ready for expert judgment.
- Task
- Testing a control.
- On your own
- Select a sample and request confirmations in a chain of messages.
- With Vera
- The sample, evidence and exceptions collected with sources for your assessment.
- Task
- Preparing a compliance update for management.
- On your own
- Combine status from spreadsheets, tickets and meeting notes.
- With Vera
- A draft with open risks, overdue actions and evidence links, waiting for your review.
Ask, then verify
Four compliance tasks you can hand to Vera today.
Ask the way you would ask a trusted analyst. Vera returns a sourced draft or evidence pack, while every conclusion and consequential action remains with your team.
@VeraBuild the Q2 evidence pack for quarterly access reviews.
The draft pack contains 18 completed reviews and links each approval to its source ticket. Two reviews are missing manager confirmation and one uses an outdated employee list. I marked all three as gaps; nothing was submitted.
Evidence and gaps in one place
@VeraWhich policies mention AI-generated content, and who owns them?
I found references in the Communications Policy, AI Use Standard and Social Media Procedure. The Communications Policy has no assigned owner, and the AI Use Standard has not been reviewed since February. Each passage and document version is linked.
Every finding carries its source
@VeraCompare Northstar’s DPA and subprocessor list with our vendor checklist. Flag gaps, but do not approve anything.
The checklist is drafted. Data location and breach notification are covered. The retention schedule is inconsistent between the DPA and security questionnaire, and the new analytics subprocessor has no review record. Both gaps are waiting for your decision.
Preparation without an automated verdict
@VeraDraft the response for control AC-07 and cite every source. Do not submit it.
The response is ready with links to the access policy, the last two quarterly reviews and three remediation tickets. One ticket is overdue, so I listed it as an open exception instead of presenting the control as fully complete.
Ready to review, never submitted automatically
She lives where you already are.
Vera answers in the window you already have open, and reaches into the systems your team already runs. Nothing to install, no second app, no extra login to remember.
- Google Drive
- Notion
- Asana
- Microsoft Teams
- Slack
- Gmail
- Google Sheets
- Google Meet
- Zoom
- Microsoft Copilot
Nothing new to learn. That is the point.
0
New tools, logins or tabs to learn.
1
Approval instead of six fields.
100%
Answers with a visible source.
Straight answers
What compliance teamsask first.
Five questions that matter when compliance teams connect Vera to policies, evidence, cases and operational records.
Does Vera decide whether we are compliant?
No. Vera gathers materials, links sources, prepares comparisons and flags missing evidence. Interpreting the requirement and deciding what it means remain with compliance, legal counsel and the accountable risk owner.
Can Vera see confidential cases and reports?
Only the systems and data your organisation explicitly connects and authorises. Existing permissions continue to determine what each person can access, including confidential case material.
Can Vera change a policy or respond to an auditor?
Vera can prepare a draft and connect it to supporting evidence. Publishing a policy, changing a record or communicating outside the company follows your approval rules and remains under human control.
Can we verify where an answer came from?
Yes. Vera links material claims to the connected document, record, message or conversation used to produce them. Requests, drafts and consequential actions remain traceable within the permissions and controls you configure.
Do we need to replace our current process or GRC system?
No. Vera works as an assisting layer across the authorised channels and repositories you already use. You can begin with one bounded workflow and keep your existing system of record and approval process.